Fig. 3

A-G Spearman rank correlation between EDSS score and indicators. A: The increase of QAlb was positively correlated with EDSS score (r = 0.4102; P = 0.0077). B: The increase of QIgG was positively correlated with the EDSS score(r = 0.5435; P = 0.0002); C: The increase of QIgA was positively correlated with the EDSS score (r = 0.4428; P = 0.0037); D: The increase of QIgM was positively correlated with the EDSS score (r = 0.5801; P = 0.0001); E: Correlation between EDSS score and NLR (r=-0.1132; P = 0.4809); F: Correlation between EDSS score and MLR(r = 0.0057; P = 0.9717); G: The increase of PLR was positively correlated with EDSS score r = 0.5887; P = 0.0001); H–N Correlation between increased EDSS scores and indicators analyzed via the Spearman rank test; H: The increase of QAlb was positively correlated with increased EDSS score (r = 0.8801; P = 0.0008). I: The increase of QIgG was positively correlated with increased EDSS score (r = 0.8186; P = 0.0038); J: The increase of QIgA was positively correlated with the EDSS score (r = 0.8124; P = 0.0043); K: Correlation between increased EDSS score and QIgM (r = 0.3693, P = 0.2936); L: The increase of NLR was positively correlated with the EDSS score (r = 0.8432, P = 0.0022); M: Correlation increased between EDSS score and MLR (r = − 0.3262, P = 0.3577); N: Correlation increased between EDSS score and PLR (r = 0.3766, P = 0.2835)