Skip to main content

Table 3 Changes in SPL in the two intervention groups

From: Comparing face-to-face and online LSVT®LOUD speech training using LSVT®Coach in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Parameter

LSVT®LOUD-tele group; N = 10

LSVT®LOUD-FTF group; N = 9

Hedge’s g effect size

Vowel Ah SPL BL

80.26 (5.33)

76.47 (3.96)

 

Vowel Ah SPL PI

79.48 (5.69)

81.44 (2.78)

 

Vowel Ah SPL Diff. PI-BL

−0.78 (3.48)

4.98 (4.64)

1.416

High pitched A SPL BL

82.30 (5.37)

77.12 (4.31)

 

High pitched A SPL PI

81.19 (4.74)

79.28 (2.71)

 

High pitched A SPL Diff. PI-BL

−1.11 (3.87)

2.16 (4.06)

0.826

Low pitched A SPL BL

70.49 (22.88)

73.86 (3.42)

 

Low pitched A SPL PI

75.72 (4.56)

76.73 (3.12)

 

Low pitched A SPL Diff. PI-BL

5.23 (21.43)

2.88 (4.30)

0.148

Good quality loud voice SPL BL

75.11 (4.61)

72.63 (4.81)

 

Good quality loud voice SPL PI

76.70 (5.70)

75.67 (5.62)

 

Good qu loud voice SPL Diff. PI-BL

1.59 (6.86)

3.03 (6.77)

0.211

Everyday phrases SPL BL

73.45 (4.80)

72.74 (3.35)

 

Everyday phrases SPL PI

73.93 (4.18)

72.73 (1.98)

 

Everyday phrases SPL Diff. PI-BL

0.48 (2.64)

−0.01 (3.22)

0.167

Text reading SPL BL

63.52 (1.57)

62.97 (3.58)

 

Text reading SPL PI

65.32 (2.92)

65.89 (3.61)

 

Text reading SPL Diff. PI-BL

1.80 (2.42)

2.92 (2.72)

0.436

Conversation SPL BL

63.07 (3.34)

61.16 (3.52)

 

Conversation SPL PI

63.86 (3.91)

63.44 (3.77)

 

Conversation SPL Diff. PI-BL

0.79 (5.38)

2.29 (2.74)

0.345

  1. Values represent mean (standard deviation)
  2. BL Baseline, Diff. difference, LSVT®LOUD-tele/FTF Lee Silverman Voice Treatment teletherapy/face-to-face therapy, N number of participants, PI post-intervention, SPL sound pressure level (decibel)